Testing $C_k$-freeness in bounded-arboricity graphs
Talya Eden, Reut Levi, Dana Ron

TL;DR
This paper investigates the complexity of testing for the absence of cycles of length k in graphs with bounded arboricity, revealing new bounds and algorithms that depend on the size of the graph for k ≥ 4.
Contribution
It establishes tight bounds and algorithms for testing cycle-freeness in bounded-arboricity graphs for various cycle lengths, addressing open problems and extending prior work.
Findings
Ω(n^{1/4}) lower bound for C_4-freeness testing
Matching upper bound of (n^{1/4}) for C_4 and C_5
An (n^{1-1/(k/2)}) upper bound for all fixed k
Abstract
We study the problem of testing -freeness (-cycle-freeness) for fixed constant in graphs with bounded arboricity (but unbounded degrees). In particular, we are interested in one-sided error algorithms, so that they must detect a copy of with high constant probability when the graph is -far from -free. We next state our results for constant arboricity and constant with a focus on the dependence on the number of graph vertices, . The query complexity of all our algorithms grows polynomially with . (1) As opposed to the case of , where the complexity of testing -freeness grows with the arboricity of the graph but not with the size of the graph (Levi, ICALP 2021) this is no longer the case already for . We show that queries are necessary for testing -freeness, and that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
