Current laboratory performance of starlight suppression systems, and potential pathways to desired Habitable Worlds Observatory exoplanet science capabilities
Bertrand Mennesson, Ruslan Belikov, Emiel Por, Eugene Serabyn, Garreth, Ruane, A.J. Eldorado Riggs, Dan Sirbu, Laurent Pueyo, Remi Soummer, Jeremy, Kasdin, Stuart Shaklan, Byoung-Joon Seo, Christopher Stark, Eric Cady, Pin, Chen, Brendan Crill, Kevin Fogarty, Alexandra Greenbaum

TL;DR
This paper reviews current laboratory starlight suppression techniques for exoplanet imaging, compares their performance, and discusses pathways to enhance capabilities for future Habitable Worlds Observatory missions.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of laboratory contrast performance of various starlight suppression systems and evaluates their potential for future exoplanet characterization missions.
Findings
Laboratory contrast performance varies across different suppression approaches.
Simulations indicate current systems can support exoearth detection with optimized performance.
Design improvements are necessary to meet future Habitable Worlds Observatory requirements.
Abstract
We summarize the current best polychromatic (10 to 20 % bandwidth) contrast performance demonstrated in the laboratory by different starlight suppression approaches and systems designed to directly characterize exoplanets around nearby stars. We present results obtained by internal coronagraph and external starshade experimental testbeds using entrance apertures equivalent to off-axis or on-axis telescopes, either monolithic or segmented. For a given angular separation and spectral bandwidth, the performance of each starlight suppression system is characterized by the values of raw contrast (before image processing), off-axis (exoplanet) core throughput, and post-calibration contrast (the final 1 sigma detection limit of off-axis point sources, after image processing). To place the current laboratory results in the perspective of the future Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO) mission, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
