Towards determining the (2+1)-dimensional Quantum Electrodynamics running coupling with Monte Carlo and quantum computing methods
Arianna Crippa, Simone Romiti, Lena Funcke, Karl Jansen, Stefan, K\"uhn, Paolo Stornati, Carsten Urbach

TL;DR
This paper proposes a combined Monte Carlo and quantum computing approach to study the running coupling in (2+1)-dimensional lattice gauge theories, aiming to bridge perturbative and non-perturbative regimes.
Contribution
It introduces a novel methodology integrating quantum circuits with Monte Carlo simulations to determine the non-perturbative $\Lambda$-parameter in lattice gauge theories.
Findings
Quantum circuits can accurately capture gauge physics via plaquette expectation values.
The combined approach successfully relates static potential and force to the renormalized coupling.
Methodology can be extended to non-Abelian gauge theories with matter fields.
Abstract
In this paper, we examine a compact lattice gauge theory in dimensions and present a strategy for studying the running coupling and extracting the non-perturbative -parameter. To this end, we combine Monte Carlo simulations and quantum computing, where the former can be used to determine the numerical value of the lattice spacing , and the latter allows for reaching the perturbative regime at very small values of the bare coupling and, correspondingly, small values of . The methodology involves a series of sequential steps (i.e., the step scaling function) to bridge results from small lattice spacings to non-perturbative large-scale lattice calculations. Focusing on the pure gauge case, we demonstrate that these quantum circuits, adapted to gauge degrees of freedom, are able to capture the relevant physics by studying the expectation value of the plaquette…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
