Lower Bounds for the Minimum Spanning Tree Cycle Intersection Problem

TL;DR

This paper establishes theoretical lower bounds for the intersection number of cycles in a graph's spanning tree, which is crucial for understanding cycle overlaps in network analysis and related applications.

Contribution

It introduces the first general lower bounds for the cycle intersection number in arbitrary connected graphs, advancing theoretical understanding of this problem.

Findings

Proves a lower bound based on the cyclomatic number and number of vertices.

Proposes a conjectured tighter lower bound based on experimental observations.

First to address bounds for cycle intersections in general connected graphs.

Abstract

Minimum spanning trees are important tools in the analysis and design of networks. Many practical applications require their computation, ranging from biology and linguistics to economy and telecommunications. The set of cycles of a network has a vector space structure. Given a spanning tree, the set of non-tree edges defines cycles that determine a basis. The intersection of two such cycles is the number of edges they have in common and the intersection number -- denoted $\cap(G)$ -- is the number of non-empty pairwise intersections of the cycles of the basis. The Minimum Spanning Tree Cycle Intersection problem consists in finding a spanning tree such that the intersection number is minimum. This problem is relevant in order to integrate discrete differential forms. In this paper, we present two lower bounds of the intersection number of an arbitrary connected graph $G=(V,E)$. In the first part, we prove the following statement: $$\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\nu^2}{n-1} - \nu\right) \leq \cap(G),$$ where $n = |V|$ and $\nu$ is the \emph{cyclomatic number} of $G$. In the second part, based on some experimental results and a new observation, we conjecture the following improved tight lower bound: $$(n-1) \binom{q}{2} + q \ r\leq \cap(G),$$ where $2 \nu = q (n-1) + r$ is the integer division of $2 \nu$ and $n-1$. This is the first result in a general context, that is for an arbitrary connected graph.