Reduced and All-at-Once Approaches for Model Calibration and Discovery in Computational Solid Mechanics

TL;DR

This paper reviews and unifies various methods for parameter estimation and model discovery in computational solid mechanics, introducing new approaches and comparing their performance on benchmark problems.

Contribution

It provides a unified framework distinguishing all-at-once and reduced methods, proposes novel combinations, and introduces a two-step uncertainty quantification procedure.

Findings

New combinations of estimation methods are identified and proposed.

A novel two-step procedure for model identification is introduced.

Methods are validated through synthetic and real data benchmarks.

Abstract

In the framework of solid mechanics, the task of deriving material parameters from experimental data has recently re-emerged with the progress in full-field measurement capabilities and the renewed advances of machine learning. In this context, new methods such as the virtual fields method and physics-informed neural networks have been developed as alternatives to the already established least-squares and finite element-based approaches. Moreover, model discovery problems are starting to emerge and can also be addressed in a parameter estimation framework. These developments call for a new unified perspective, which is able to cover both traditional parameter estimation methods and novel approaches in which the state variables or the model structure itself are inferred as well. Adopting concepts discussed in the inverse problems community, we distinguish between all-at-once and reduced approaches. With this general framework, we are able to structure a large portion of the literature on parameter estimation in computational mechanics - and we can identify combinations that have not yet been addressed, two of which are proposed in this paper. We also discuss statistical approaches to quantify the uncertainty related to the estimated parameters, and we propose a novel two-step procedure for identification of complex material models based on both frequentist and Bayesian principles. Finally, we illustrate and compare several of the aforementioned methods with mechanical benchmarks based on synthetic and real data.