The Black-Hole Masses of High-Redshift QSOs
Andrew King

TL;DR
This paper proposes that high-redshift quasars' large black hole mass estimates may be overestimated due to beaming effects, similar to ultraluminous X-ray sources, implying they could have smaller, stellar-mass black holes.
Contribution
It introduces a model where beaming and outflows affect mass estimates of high-redshift quasars, challenging the assumption of supermassive black holes at early cosmic times.
Findings
Beaming causes overestimation of black hole masses in quasars.
Emission-line properties remain similar in beamed and unbeamed sources.
High-redshift quasars may host stellar-mass black holes, not supermassive ones.
Abstract
Observations of high-redshift quasars frequently promote suggestions of large black hole masses, whose presence so early in cosmic time is not easily explicable. I consider the parallel with ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) -- now known to be stellar-mass black hole (and neutron star) binaries apparently radiating far above their Eddington luminosities . The true luminosity in ULXs is actually only of order , for {\it stellar-mass} accretors, but has a very anisotropic (`beamed') component, plus a near-isotropic component of similar luminosity but much lower specific intensity. Observers viewing ULXs from within the beam but assuming spherical symmetry deduce a luminosity . These features appear because the accretors are fed mass at highly super-Eddington rates, most of it expelled in high-speed () outflows from the accretion disc.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstronomy and Astrophysical Research · Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations · Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
