Understanding Measurement Precision from a Regression Perspective
Yang Liu, Jolynn Pek, Alberto Maydeu-Olivares

TL;DR
This paper extends McDonald's regression framework to measure the precision of observed and latent scores, proposing a Monte Carlo method for estimation, with applications in factor analysis and item response models.
Contribution
It introduces a unified regression-based approach to quantify measurement precision and demonstrates how to estimate reliability and PRMSE using Monte Carlo methods.
Findings
Reliability and PRMSE can be estimated via isomorphic regressions.
Monte Carlo method effectively estimates measurement precision.
Applications shown in factor analysis and item response models.
Abstract
We adopt and expand McDonald's (2011) regression framework for measurement precision, integrating two key perspectives: (a) reliability of observed scores and (b) optimal prediction of latent scores. Reliability arises from a measurement decomposition of an observed score into its true score and measurement error. In contrast, proportional reduction in mean squared error (PRMSE) arises from a prediction decomposition of a latent score into its optimal predictor (the observed expected a posteriori [EAP] score) and prediction error. Reliability is the coefficient of determination obtained by two isomorphic regressions: regressing the observed score on its true score or on all the latent variables. Similarly, PRMSE is the coefficient of determination obtained from two isomorphic regressions: regressing the latent score on its observed EAP score or all the manifest variables. A key…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFault Detection and Control Systems · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
