Counterfactuality, back-action, and information gain in multi-path interferometers
Jonte R. Hance, Tomonori Matsushita, Holger F. Hofmann

TL;DR
This paper investigates quantum counterfactual effects in multi-path interferometers, quantifying how absorbers influence output statistics and demonstrating the quantum advantage over classical protocols through information gain and quasiprobability analysis.
Contribution
It introduces a quantitative framework for counterfactual effects, including the concept of counterfactual gain and the role of Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobabilities in multi-path interferometers.
Findings
Quantum counterfactual effects are linked to negative Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobabilities.
Counterfactual gain can be separated into semi-classical and quantum components.
Back-action effects, not just particle removal, drive quantum counterfactual phenomena.
Abstract
The presence of an absorber in one of the paths of an interferometer changes the output statistics of that interferometer in a fundamental manner. Since the individual quantum particles detected at any of the outputs of the interferometer have not been absorbed, any non-trivial effect of the absorber on the distribution of these particles over these paths is a counterfactual effect. Here, we quantify counterfactual effects by evaluating the information about the presence or absence of the absorber obtained from the output statistics, distinguishing between classical and quantum counterfactual effects. We identify the counterfactual gain which quantifies the advantage of quantum counterfactual protocols over classical counterfactual protocols, and show that this counterfactual gain can be separated into two terms: a semi-classical term related to the amplitude blocked by the absorber,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
