Validating a lutetium frequency reference
Kyle J. Arnold, Scott Bustabad, Qin Qichen, Zhao Zhang, Qi, Zhao, Murray D. Barrett

TL;DR
This paper discusses the development and validation of a lutetium-based optical frequency reference, emphasizing its potential for extremely high accuracy and the advantages of using frequency ratios for system comparisons.
Contribution
It presents a detailed analysis of lutetium ion transitions as a frequency reference and proposes a method for comparing remote systems using frequency ratios to ensure accuracy.
Findings
Achievable accuracy at the 10^{-19} level for lutetium transitions.
Frequency ratio measurements are robust against environmental and relativistic effects.
Discrepancies in ratios indicate at least one system's measurement is incorrect.
Abstract
We review our progress in developing a frequency reference with singly ionized lutetium and give estimates of the levels of inaccuracy we expect to achieve in the near future with both the and transitions. Based on established experimental results, we show that inaccuracies at the low level are readily achievable for the transition, and the frequency ratio between the two transitions is limited almost entirely by the BBR shift. We argue that the frequency ratio measured within the one apparatus provides a well-defined metric to compare and establish the performance of remotely located systems. For the measurement of an in situ frequency ratio, relativistic shifts drop out and both transitions experience the same electromagnetic environment. Consequently, the uncertainty budget for the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
