When does a bent concatenation not belong to the completed Maiorana-McFarland class?
Sadmir Kudin, Enes Pasalic, Alexandr Polujan, Fengrong Zhang

TL;DR
This paper characterizes when certain Boolean bent function concatenations do not belong to the completed Maiorana-McFarland class, providing conditions and construction methods for such functions.
Contribution
It offers a complete characterization of the structure of -spaces for specific bent function concatenations and identifies conditions for functions to lie outside the Maiorana-McFarland class.
Findings
Full characterization of -spaces for concatenations of two and four functions.
Necessary and sufficient conditions for a concatenated bent function to be outside .
Explicit construction methods for bent functions outside the Maiorana-McFarland class.
Abstract
Every Boolean bent function can be written either as a concatenation of two complementary semi-bent functions ; or as a concatenation of four Boolean functions , all of which are simultaneously bent, semi-bent, or 5-valued spectra-functions. In this context, it is essential to ask: When does a bent concatenation (not) belong to the completed Maiorana-McFarland class ? In this article, we answer this question completely by providing a full characterization of the structure of -subspaces for the concatenation of the form and , which allows us to specify the necessary and sufficient conditions so that is outside . Based on these conditions, we propose several explicit design methods of specifying bent functions outside in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
