Cosmological constraints from weak lensing scattering transform using HSC Y1 data

TL;DR

This paper introduces the first cosmological constraints using the weak lensing scattering transform on HSC Y1 data, demonstrating improved precision over traditional methods and highlighting redshift estimation as a key challenge.

Contribution

It presents a novel application of the weak lensing scattering transform for cosmology, achieving tighter constraints and comparing its effectiveness to neural networks and power spectrum analyses.

Findings

Constraints are consistent with Planck results.

Error bar on Ω_m is twice as tight as power spectrum analysis.

Redshift bin around z~1 causes tension in S_8 estimates.

Abstract

As weak lensing surveys go deeper, there is an increasing need for reliable characterization of non-Gaussian structures at small angular scales. Here we present the first cosmological constraints with weak lensing scattering transform, a statistical estimator that combines efficiency, robustness, and interpretability. With the Hyper Suprime-Cam survey (HSC) year 1 data, we obtain $\Omega_\text{m}=0.29_{-0.03}^{+0.04}$, $S_8\equiv \sigma_8(\Omega_\text{m}/0.3)^{0.5}=0.83\pm0.02$, and intrinsic alignment strength $A_\text{IA}=1.0\pm0.4$ through simulation-based forward modeling. Our constraints are consistent with those derived from Planck. The error bar of $\Omega_\text{m}$ is 2 times tighter than that obtained from the power spectrum when the same scale range is used. This constraining power is on par with that of convolutional neural networks, suggesting that further investment in spatial information extraction may not yield substantial benefits. We also point out an internal tension of $S_8$ estimates linked to a redshift bin around z ~ 1 in the HSC data. We found that discarding that bin leads to a consistent decrease of $S_8$ from 0.83 to 0.79, for all statistical estimators. We argue that photometric redshift estimation is now the main limitation in the estimation of $S_8$ using HSC. This limitation is likely to affect other ground-based weak lensing surveys reaching redshifts greater than one. Alternative redshift estimation techniques, like clustering redshifts, may help alleviate this limitation.