From "AI" to Probabilistic Automation: How Does Anthropomorphization of Technical Systems Descriptions Influence Trust?
Nanna Inie, Stefania Druga, Peter Zukerman, Emily M. Bender

TL;DR
This study examines how anthropomorphized descriptions of AI systems affect trust, finding no overall increase in trust from anthropomorphization, but highlighting that product type and demographics influence perceptions.
Contribution
It categorizes four types of anthropomorphization and empirically investigates their impact on trust through a large survey, providing nuanced insights into public perceptions of AI descriptions.
Findings
No overall trust increase from anthropomorphization
Product type and demographic factors influence trust perceptions
Anthropomorphization effects vary across different groups
Abstract
This paper investigates the influence of anthropomorphized descriptions of so-called "AI" (artificial intelligence) systems on people's self-assessment of trust in the system. Building on prior work, we define four categories of anthropomorphization (1. Properties of a cognizer, 2. Agency, 3. Biological metaphors, and 4. Properties of a communicator). We use a survey-based approach (n=954) to investigate whether participants are likely to trust one of two (fictitious) "AI" systems by randomly assigning people to see either an anthropomorphized or a de-anthropomorphized description of the systems. We find that participants are no more likely to trust anthropomorphized over de-anthropmorphized product descriptions overall. The type of product or system in combination with different anthropomorphic categories appears to exert greater influence on trust than anthropomorphizing language…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
