Information Cocoons on Social Media: Why and How Should the Government Regulate Algorithms
Wen Yang

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the causes and implications of information cocoons on social media, emphasizing the need for regulation through nudges to promote diversity while maintaining freedom of choice.
Contribution
It provides a behavioral perspective on why social media algorithms foster information cocoons and proposes libertarian paternalism as a regulatory approach.
Findings
Algorithm-based social media increases ideological segregation
Information diversity is crucial for a sustainable information environment
Nudges can address core issues while preserving freedom of choice
Abstract
Information cocoons are frequently cited in the literature on whether and how social media might lead to ideological segregation and political polarization. From the behavioural and communication perspectives, this paper first examines why algorithm-based social media, as opposed to its traditional counterpart, is more likely to produce information cocoons. We then explore populism and short-termism in voting, bias and noise in decision-making, and prerequisite capital for innovation, demonstrating the importance of information diversity for a sustainable information environment. Finally, this study argues for libertarian paternalism by evaluating the criteria and trade-offs involved in regulating algorithms and proposes to employ nudges to address the core issues while preserving freedom of choice.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSocial Media and Politics · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection · Misinformation and Its Impacts
