The Ability of Virtual Reality Technologies to Improve Comprehension of Speech Therapy Device Training
Daniel E. Killough

TL;DR
This study assesses virtual reality's effectiveness in speech therapy device training, finding VR viable but less effective than traditional methods for knowledge acquisition, with mixed participant preferences.
Contribution
It introduces VR as a teaching tool in speech therapy and compares its effectiveness to traditional lectures, highlighting areas for further research.
Findings
VR is a viable learning tool in speech therapy.
Participants scored lower with VR compared to traditional videos.
Half of the VR group preferred VR over traditional lectures.
Abstract
This study evaluates the usage of virtual reality (VR) technologies as a teaching tool in oral placement therapy, a subset of speech therapy. The researcher distributed instructional videos using traditional lecture and modified three-dimensional video to prompt responses. Data was gathered with a two-part Google Form: In "Section 1: Knowledge Test" participants were asked to determine how well they received the information displayed to them. In "Section 2: Opinion Test" participants were asked diagnostic and subjective questions via Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to 5 ("Strongly Agree") to determine how well they enjoyed viewing the information displayed to them. Averages for Section 1 were 92.00% for the control group (viewing 2D, unmodified video) and 77.88% for the experimental group (viewing 3D, VR video). Almost all participants answered at least 60% of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTechnology and Human Factors in Education and Health · Education and Professional Development · Innovative Educational Technologies
