Equivalence Relations in Quantum Theory: An Objective Account of Bases and Factorizations
Christian de Ronde, Raimundo Fernandez Moujan, Cesar Massri

TL;DR
This paper offers an invariant, objective account of bases and factorizations in quantum theory, addressing the perspectival relativism that challenges rational understanding of quantum states and entanglement.
Contribution
It introduces an invariant framework based on the logos categorical approach, linking mathematical formalism with quantum phenomena to clarify equivalence relations.
Findings
Provides an invariant account of bases and factorizations.
Establishes a conceptual bridge between formalism and phenomena.
Addresses the relativism in quantum reference frames.
Abstract
In orthodox Standard Quantum Mechanics (SQM) bases and factorizations are considered to define quantum states and entanglement in relativistic terms. While the choice of a basis (interpreted as a measurement context) defines a state incompatible to that same state in a different basis, the choice of a factorization (interpreted as the separability of systems into sub-systems) determines wether the same state is entangled or non-entangled. Of course, this perspectival relativism with respect to reference frames and factorizations precludes not only the widespread reference to quantum particles but more generally the possibility of any rational objective account of a state of affairs in general. In turn, this impossibility ends up justifying the instrumentalist (anti-realist) approach that contemporary quantum physics has followed since the establishment of SQM during the 1930s. In…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications
