Random Indicator Imputation for Missing Not At Random Data
Shahab Jolani, Stef van Buuren

TL;DR
This paper introduces the Random Indicator (RI) imputation method for MNAR data, which estimates adjustment parameters directly from data, improving imputation accuracy in missing not at random scenarios.
Contribution
The novel RI method estimates MNAR adjustment parameters from data, unlike existing methods that require user-specified values, enhancing automaticity and robustness.
Findings
Performs well across various simulation scenarios
Effective in real-world data application
Automatically estimates MNAR adjustment parameters
Abstract
Imputation methods for dealing with incomplete data typically assume that the missingness mechanism is at random (MAR). These methods can also be applied to missing not at random (MNAR) situations, where the user specifies some adjustment parameters that describe the degree of departure from MAR. The effect of different pre-chosen values is then studied on the inferences. This paper proposes a novel imputation method, the Random Indicator (RI) method, which, in contrast to the current methodology, estimates these adjustment parameters from the data. For an incomplete variable , the RI method assumes that the observed part of is normal and the probability for to be missing follows a logistic function. The idea is to estimate the adjustment parameters by generating a pseudo response indicator from this logistic function. Our method iteratively draws imputations for and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Inference · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Multi-Criteria Decision Making
