The SAGA Survey. III. A Census of 101 Satellite Systems around Milky Way-mass Galaxies
Yao-Yuan Mao (1), Marla Geha (2), Risa H. Wechsler (3), Yasmeen Asali, (2), Yunchong Wang (3), Erin Kado-Fong (2), Nitya Kallivayalil (4), Ethan O., Nadler (5, 6, and 7), Erik J. Tollerud (8), Benjamin Weiner (9), Mithi A. C., de los Reyes (10), John F. Wu (9, 11) ((1) U Utah

TL;DR
The SAGA Survey's third data release provides a comprehensive spectroscopic census of 378 satellite galaxies around 101 Milky Way-mass hosts, revealing diversity in satellite properties and distributions, and offering insights into galaxy formation and satellite dynamics.
Contribution
This work presents the largest, most complete spectroscopic survey of satellite galaxies around MW-mass hosts, including detailed completeness modeling and comparative analysis with the Milky Way.
Findings
Satellite abundance correlates with the mass of the most massive satellite.
One-third of systems contain LMC-mass satellites, often with more satellites than the MW.
Satellite radial distribution is less concentrated than in the MW.
Abstract
We present Data Release 3 (DR3) of the Satellites Around Galactic Analogs (SAGA) Survey, a spectroscopic survey characterizing satellite galaxies around Milky Way (MW)-mass galaxies. The SAGA Survey DR3 includes 378 satellites identified across 101 MW-mass systems in the distance range of 25-40.75 Mpc, and an accompanying redshift catalog of background galaxies (including about 46,000 taken by SAGA) in the SAGA footprint of 84.7 sq. deg. The number of confirmed satellites per system ranges from zero to 13, in the stellar mass range of 10^6 to 10^10 solar masses. Based on a detailed completeness model, this sample accounts for 94% of the true satellite population down to a stellar mass of 10^7.5 solar masses. We find that the mass of the most massive satellite in SAGA systems is the strongest predictor of satellite abundance; one-third of the SAGA systems contain LMC-mass satellites, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstronomy and Astrophysical Research · Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
