A community-led calibration of the Zr isotope Reference Materials: NIST candidate RM 8299 and SRM 3169
Fran\c{c}ois L.H. Tissot, Mauricio Iba\~nez-Mejia, Savelas A. Rabb,, Rebecca A. Kraft, Robert D. Vocke, Manuela A. Fehr, Maria Sch\"onb\"achler,, Haolan Tang, Edward D. Young

TL;DR
This paper reports the development and calibration of a new zirconium isotope reference material, RM 8299, through a community-led inter-laboratory study, ensuring a standardized, homogeneous, and conflict-free benchmark for future Zr isotope research.
Contribution
It introduces RM 8299 as a new, well-characterized Zr isotope reference material, calibrated via inter-laboratory efforts, and recommends its use for consistent isotope data reporting.
Findings
RM 8299 is isotopically homogeneous and high-purity.
RM 8299 matches the composition of Ocean Island Basalts.
Existing SRM 3169 lots are equivalent to RM 8299.
Abstract
As the field of Zr stable isotopes is rapidly expanding from the study of mass-independent to that of mass-dependent isotope effects, a variety of Zr standards have appeared in the literature. While several of these standards have been proposed as the ideal isotope reference material (iRM) against which all data should be reported, none of them have been shown to meet the compositional and/or conflict-of-interest-free distribution requirements put forth by the community. To remedy this situation, we report on a community-led effort to develop and calibrate a scale defining iRM for Zr isotopes: NIST RM 8299. Developed in partnership with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) from the widely used SRM 3169 Zr Standard Solution, the candidate RM 8299 was calibrated through an inter-laboratory study involving three laboratories. Our data show that RM 8299 meets all…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
