Quantifying Scalar Field Dynamics with DESI 2024 Y1 BAO measurements

TL;DR

This paper analyzes DESI 2024 Y1 BAO measurements to fit scalar field dark energy models, finding some preference for quintessence but also highlighting tensions with the standard cosmological model, which scalar fields can help alleviate.

Contribution

It directly fits simple scalar field models to DESI BAO data combined with other cosmological probes, exploring their ability to address tensions in cosmological parameters.

Findings

Best fit scalar field model includes 2-4% kinetic energy.

Supernova data shows preference for quintessence over ΛCDM at 95% confidence.

Scalar fields help mitigate tensions in matter density estimates.

Abstract

Quintessence scalar fields are a natural candidate for evolving dark energy. Unlike the phenomenological $w_0w_a$ parameterization of the dark energy equation of state, they cannot accommodate the phantom regime of dark energy $w(z) < -1$, or crossings into the phantom regime. Recent baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) indicate a preference for evolving dark energy over a cosmological constant, ranging from $2.6\sigma-3.9\sigma$ when fitting to $w_0w_a$, and combining the DESI BAO measurements with other cosmological probes. In this work, we directly fit three simple scalar field models to the DESI BAO data, combined with cosmic microwave background anisotropy measurements and supernova data sets. We find the best fit model to include a $2-4\%$ kinetic scalar field energy $\Omega_{\rm scf,k}$, for a canonical scalar field with a quadratic or linear potential. However, only the DESY-Y5 supernova data set combination shows a preference for quintessence over $\Lambda$CDM at the $95\%$ confidence level. Fitting to the supernova data sets Pantheon, Pantheon+, DES-Y5, and Union3, we show that the mild tension ($n_{\sigma}< 3.4 $) under $\Lambda$CDM emerges from a BAO preference for smaller values of fractional mass-energy density $\Omega_m < 0.29$, while all supernova data sets, except for Pantheon, prefer larger values, $\Omega_m > 0.3$. The tension under $\Lambda$CDM remains noticeable ($n_{\sigma} <2.8$), when replacing two of the DESI BAO redshift bins with effective redshifts $z_{\text{eff}} =0.51$, and $z_{\text{eff}}= 0.706$ with comparable BOSS DR 12 BAO measurements at $z_{\text{eff}} =0.51$, and $z_{\text{eff}}= 0.61$. Canonical scalar fields as dark energy are successful in mitigating that tension.