Dismantling Common Internet Services for Ad-Malware Detection
Florian Nettersheim, Stephan Arlt, Michael Rademacher

TL;DR
This study evaluates how different Internet services detect ad-malware, revealing inconsistencies and highlighting the need for a unified definition and improved detection methods for safer online advertising.
Contribution
It provides an empirical analysis of ad-malware detection by comparing responses from DNS providers and VirusTotal, exposing discrepancies and proposing future research directions.
Findings
Up to 0.47% of domains labeled suspicious by DNS providers.
Up to 8.8% of domains labeled suspicious by VirusTotal.
Only 0.7% to 3.2% of suspicious domains are categorized as ad-malware.
Abstract
Online advertising represents a main instrument for publishers to fund content on the World Wide Web. Unfortunately, a significant number of online advertisements often accommodates potentially malicious content, such as cryptojacking hidden in web banners - even on reputable websites. In order to protect Internet users from such online threats, the thorough detection of ad-malware campaigns plays a crucial role for a safe Web. Today, common Internet services like VirusTotal can label suspicious content based on feedback from contributors and from the entire Web community. However, it is open to which extent ad-malware is actually taken into account and whether the results of these services are consistent. In this pre-study, we evaluate who defines ad-malware on the Internet. In a first step, we crawl a vast set of websites and fetch all HTTP requests (particularly to online…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Malware Detection Techniques · Network Security and Intrusion Detection · Digital and Cyber Forensics
