Faster Algorithms for Dual-Failure Replacement Paths

TL;DR

This paper introduces the first truly subcubic combinatorial algorithm for dual failure replacement paths in unweighted directed graphs, significantly improving the runtime over previous methods and exploring algebraic solutions for weighted cases.

Contribution

It presents the first truly subcubic combinatorial algorithm for dual failure replacement paths in unweighted digraphs and advances algebraic algorithms for weighted graphs with small integer weights.

Findings

Achieved a runtime of O(n^{3-1/18}) for unweighted digraphs.

Developed an algebraic algorithm with runtime O(Mn^{2.8716}) for weighted graphs with small integer weights.

Improved upon previous algorithms with higher runtimes and established new bounds for dual failure replacement paths.

Abstract

Given a simple weighted directed graph $G = (V, E, \omega)$ on $n$ vertices as well as two designated terminals $s, t\in V$, our goal is to compute the shortest path from $s$ to $t$ avoiding any pair of presumably failed edges $f_1, f_2\in E$, which is a natural generalization of the classical replacement path problem which considers single edge failures only. This dual failure replacement paths problem was recently studied by Vassilevska Williams, Woldeghebriel and Xu [FOCS 2022] who designed a cubic time algorithm for general weighted digraphs which is conditionally optimal; in the same paper, for unweighted graphs where $\omega \equiv 1$, the authors presented an algebraic algorithm with runtime $\tilde{O}(n^{2.9146})$, as well as a conditional lower bound of $n^{8/3-o(1)}$ against combinatorial algorithms. However, it was unknown in their work whether fast matrix multiplication is necessary for a subcubic runtime in unweighted digraphs. As our primary result, we present the first truly subcubic combinatorial algorithm for dual failure replacement paths in unweighted digraphs. Our runtime is $\tilde{O}(n^{3-1/18})$. Besides, we also study algebraic algorithms for digraphs with small integer edge weights from $\{-M, -M+1, \cdots, M-1, M\}$. As our secondary result, we obtained a runtime of $\tilde{O}(Mn^{2.8716})$, which is faster than the previous bound of $\tilde{O}(M^{2/3}n^{2.9144} + Mn^{2.8716})$ from [Vassilevska Williams, Woldeghebriela and Xu, 2022].