Counterfactual Reasoning Using Predicted Latent Personality Dimensions for Optimizing Persuasion Outcome
Donghuo Zeng, Roberto S. Legaspi, Yuewen Sun, Xinshuai Dong, and Kazushi Ikeda, Peter Spirtes, kun Zhang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel counterfactual reasoning approach that tracks latent personality dimensions during persuasive conversations, generating tailored utterances to improve persuasion outcomes using advanced generative and reinforcement learning models.
Contribution
It proposes a new method combining BiCoGAN, DPPR, and D3QN models to dynamically adapt persuasive dialogues based on user personality, enhancing effectiveness over existing techniques.
Findings
Outperforms existing BiCoGAN method in persuasion tasks
Achieves higher cumulative rewards and Q-values
Demonstrates the effectiveness of counterfactual reasoning in dialogue systems
Abstract
Customizing persuasive conversations related to the outcome of interest for specific users achieves better persuasion results. However, existing persuasive conversation systems rely on persuasive strategies and encounter challenges in dynamically adjusting dialogues to suit the evolving states of individual users during interactions. This limitation restricts the system's ability to deliver flexible or dynamic conversations and achieve suboptimal persuasion outcomes. In this paper, we present a novel approach that tracks a user's latent personality dimensions (LPDs) during ongoing persuasion conversation and generates tailored counterfactual utterances based on these LPDs to optimize the overall persuasion outcome. In particular, our proposed method leverages a Bi-directional Generative Adversarial Network (BiCoGAN) in tandem with a Dialogue-based Personality Prediction Regression…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
