Holding the Line: A Study of Writers' Attitudes on Co-creativity with AI
Morteza Behrooz, Yuandong Tian, William Ngan, Yael Yungster, Justin, Wong, David Zax

TL;DR
This study explores writers' attitudes towards AI co-creativity, revealing diverse preferences and boundaries, and provides insights for designing AI tools that respect writers' agency and comfort levels.
Contribution
It offers a qualitative analysis of writers' attitudes towards AI, mapping their openness across different writing stages and modes, which is novel in understanding co-creativity dynamics.
Findings
Most writers are interested in AI assistance to some extent.
Writers prefer to set firm boundaries with AI to maintain control.
Openness to AI varies across different stages and modes of writing.
Abstract
Generative AI has put many professional writers on the defensive; a major negotiation point of the recent Writers Guild of America's strike concerned use of AI. However, must AI threaten writers, their livelihoods or their creativity? And under what conditions, if any, might AI assistance be invited by different types of writers (from the amateur to the professional, from the screenwriter to the novelist)? To explore these questions, we conducted a qualitative study with 37 writers. We found that most writing occurs across five stages and within one of three modes; we additionally map openness to AI assistance to each intersecting stage-mode. We found that most writers were interested in AI assistance to some degree, but some writers felt drawing firm boundaries with an AI was key to their comfort using such systems. Designers can leverage these insights to build agency-respecting AI…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCreativity in Education and Neuroscience
