Characterizing and modeling harms from interactions with design patterns in AI interfaces
Lujain Ibrahim, Luc Rocher, Ana Valdivia

TL;DR
This paper reviews harmful design patterns in AI interfaces, introduces the DECAI model based on control systems theory to assess impacts, and demonstrates its application through case studies on recommendation and conversational AI systems.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive review of harmful AI interface patterns and proposes DECAI, a novel impact assessment framework based on control theory.
Findings
Identified key harmful design patterns in AI interfaces
Demonstrated DECAI's effectiveness through case studies
Highlighted the importance of impact assessment in AI interface design
Abstract
The proliferation of applications using artificial intelligence (AI) systems has led to a growing number of users interacting with these systems through sophisticated interfaces. Human-computer interaction research has long shown that interfaces shape both user behavior and user perception of technical capabilities and risks. Yet, practitioners and researchers evaluating the social and ethical risks of AI systems tend to overlook the impact of anthropomorphic, deceptive, and immersive interfaces on human-AI interactions. Here, we argue that design features of interfaces with adaptive AI systems can have cascading impacts, driven by feedback loops, which extend beyond those previously considered. We first conduct a scoping review of AI interface designs and their negative impact to extract salient themes of potentially harmful design patterns in AI interfaces. Then, we propose…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI
