How fair are we? From conceptualization to automated assessment of fairness definitions

TL;DR

This paper introduces MODNESS, a novel modeling environment that allows users to define and customize fairness concepts and metrics for software systems, addressing limitations of existing approaches.

Contribution

The paper presents MODNESS, a new approach enabling user-defined fairness concepts and metrics, expanding applicability across domains and improving upon existing model-driven fairness assessment methods.

Findings

Most current approaches lack support for user-defined fairness concepts.

MODNESS can address bias in recommender systems and Arduino software.

It outperforms existing model-driven approaches in flexibility and domain coverage.

Abstract

Fairness is a critical concept in ethics and social domains, but it is also a challenging property to engineer in software systems. With the increasing use of machine learning in software systems, researchers have been developing techniques to automatically assess the fairness of software systems. Nonetheless, a significant proportion of these techniques rely upon pre-established fairness definitions, metrics, and criteria, which may fail to encompass the wide-ranging needs and preferences of users and stakeholders. To overcome this limitation, we propose a novel approach, called MODNESS, that enables users to customize and define their fairness concepts using a dedicated modeling environment. Our approach guides the user through the definition of new fairness concepts also in emerging domains, and the specification and composition of metrics for its evaluation. Ultimately, MODNESS generates the source code to implement fair assessment based on these custom definitions. In addition, we elucidate the process we followed to collect and analyze relevant literature on fairness assessment in software engineering (SE). We compare MODNESS with the selected approaches and evaluate how they support the distinguishing features identified by our study. Our findings reveal that i) most of the current approaches do not support user-defined fairness concepts; ii) our approach can cover two additional application domains not addressed by currently available tools, i.e., mitigating bias in recommender systems for software engineering and Arduino software component recommendations; iii) MODNESS demonstrates the capability to overcome the limitations of the only two other Model-Driven Engineering-based approaches for fairness assessment.