Utility-Fairness Trade-Offs and How to Find Them
Sepehr Dehdashtian, Bashir Sadeghi, Vishnu Naresh Boddeti

TL;DR
This paper investigates the fundamental trade-offs between utility and fairness in classification systems, introduces methods to quantify these trade-offs from data, and evaluates current approaches against these theoretical limits.
Contribution
It introduces the Data-Space and Label-Space Trade-offs, proposes U-FaTE to quantify trade-offs from data, and provides an extensive evaluation of existing fair representation methods.
Findings
Most current approaches are far from optimal trade-offs.
Three regions of utility-fairness trade-offs are identified.
The proposed methods effectively quantify the trade-offs from data.
Abstract
When building classification systems with demographic fairness considerations, there are two objectives to satisfy: 1) maximizing utility for the specific task and 2) ensuring fairness w.r.t. a known demographic attribute. These objectives often compete, so optimizing both can lead to a trade-off between utility and fairness. While existing works acknowledge the trade-offs and study their limits, two questions remain unanswered: 1) What are the optimal trade-offs between utility and fairness? and 2) How can we numerically quantify these trade-offs from data for a desired prediction task and demographic attribute of interest? This paper addresses these questions. We introduce two utility-fairness trade-offs: the Data-Space and Label-Space Trade-off. The trade-offs reveal three regions within the utility-fairness plane, delineating what is fully and partially possible and impossible. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Systems and Decision Making
