Does DESI 2024 Confirm $\Lambda$CDM?
Eoin \'O Colg\'ain, Maria Giovanna Dainotti, Salvatore Capozziello, Saeed Pourojaghi, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Dejan Stojkovic

TL;DR
This paper investigates a notable discrepancy in DESI LRG data at redshift 0.51, which suggests a higher matter density parameter, potentially impacting cosmological model preferences and highlighting the need for further analysis of this outlier.
Contribution
The study identifies and characterizes an anomaly in DESI LRG data at z=0.51, exploring its implications for cosmological parameters and model preferences compared to previous observations.
Findings
DESI LRG data at z=0.51 shows a 2 sigma discrepancy with Planck-$cdm$.
This anomaly influences the preference for $w_0 > -1$ in DESI data.
The anomaly's significance is estimated at about 1.8 sigma and may decrease with future data.
Abstract
We demonstrate that a discrepancy with the Planck-CDM cosmology in DESI Luminous Red Galaxy (LRG) data in the redshift range with effective redshift translates into an unexpectedly large value, . We independently confirm that this anomaly drives the preference for in DESI data \textit{alone} confronted to the CDM model. Given that LRG data at is at odds with Type Ia supernovae in overlapping redshifts, we expect that this anomaly will decrease in statistical significance with future DESI data releases leaving an increasing trend with effective redshift at higher redshifts. We estimate the current significance of the latter in DESI data at and comment on how it dovetails with independent observations. It…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsManufacturing Process and Optimization
