Measuring Domain Shifts using Deep Learning Remote Photoplethysmography Model Similarity
Nathan Vance, Patrick Flynn

TL;DR
This paper introduces model similarity metrics to measure domain shifts in remote photoplethysmography, enabling better model selection in real-world scenarios without ground truth, and shows significant performance improvements.
Contribution
It proposes novel model similarity metrics for domain shift detection in rPPG and demonstrates their effectiveness in model selection without requiring ground truth data.
Findings
High correlation between proposed metrics and empirical performance
DS-diff metric works without access to ground truth
13.9% performance improvement in model selection
Abstract
Domain shift differences between training data for deep learning models and the deployment context can result in severe performance issues for models which fail to generalize. We study the domain shift problem under the context of remote photoplethysmography (rPPG), a technique for video-based heart rate inference. We propose metrics based on model similarity which may be used as a measure of domain shift, and we demonstrate high correlation between these metrics and empirical performance. One of the proposed metrics with viable correlations, DS-diff, does not assume access to the ground truth of the target domain, i.e. it may be applied to in-the-wild data. To that end, we investigate a model selection problem in which ground truth results for the evaluation domain is not known, demonstrating a 13.9% performance improvement over the average case baseline.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
