PIM-Opt: Demystifying Distributed Optimization Algorithms on a Real-World Processing-In-Memory System

TL;DR

This paper evaluates the performance of distributed SGD algorithms on real-world Processing-In-Memory systems, demonstrating potential advantages over traditional architectures and highlighting the importance of algorithm-hardware co-design.

Contribution

It implements and assesses distributed SGD algorithms on a real PIM system, providing insights into their performance, scalability, and implications for future hardware-software co-design.

Findings

PIM can be a viable alternative to CPUs and GPUs for memory-bound ML workloads

Careful selection of algorithms is crucial for PIM efficiency

PIM systems do not scale linearly with node count in data-intensive tasks

Abstract

Modern Machine Learning (ML) training on large-scale datasets is a very time-consuming workload. It relies on the optimization algorithm Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) due to its effectiveness, simplicity, and generalization performance. Processor-centric architectures (e.g., CPUs, GPUs) commonly used for modern ML training workloads based on SGD are bottlenecked by data movement between the processor and memory units due to the poor data locality in accessing large datasets. As a result, processor-centric architectures suffer from low performance and high energy consumption while executing ML training workloads. Processing-In-Memory (PIM) is a promising solution to alleviate the data movement bottleneck by placing the computation mechanisms inside or near memory. Our goal is to understand the capabilities of popular distributed SGD algorithms on real-world PIM systems to accelerate data-intensive ML training workloads. To this end, we 1) implement several representative centralized parallel SGD algorithms on the real-world UPMEM PIM system, 2) rigorously evaluate these algorithms for ML training on large-scale datasets in terms of performance, accuracy, and scalability, 3) compare to conventional CPU and GPU baselines, and 4) discuss implications for future PIM hardware and highlight the need for a shift to an algorithm-hardware codesign. Our results demonstrate three major findings: 1) The UPMEM PIM system can be a viable alternative to state-of-the-art CPUs and GPUs for many memory-bound ML training workloads, especially when operations and datatypes are natively supported by PIM hardware, 2) it is important to carefully choose the optimization algorithms that best fit PIM, and 3) the UPMEM PIM system does not scale approximately linearly with the number of nodes for many data-intensive ML training workloads. We open source all our code to facilitate future research.