Commitments are equivalent to statistically-verifiable one-way state generators
Rishabh Batra, Rahul Jain

TL;DR
This paper establishes that a certain class of statistically-verifiable quantum one-way state generators are equivalent to quantum commitments, highlighting the minimal resources needed for quantum cryptographic primitives.
Contribution
It proves the equivalence between O(n/log(n))-copy sv-OWSGs and quantum commitments, identifying the weakest such generators capable of supporting quantum cryptography.
Findings
O(n/log(n))-copy sv-OWSGs are equivalent to quantum commitments
Known results show o(n/log(n))-copy sv-OWSGs cannot imply commitments
Construction offers a simpler alternative for classical pseudorandom generators
Abstract
One-way state generators (OWSG) are natural quantum analogs to classical one-way functions. We consider statistically-verifiable OWSGs (sv-OWSG), which are potentially weaker objects than OWSGs. We show that O(n/log(n))-copy sv-OWSGs (n represents the input length) are equivalent to poly(n)-copy sv-OWSGs and to quantum commitments. Since known results show that o(n/log(n))-copy OWSGs cannot imply commitments, this shows that O(n/log(n))-copy sv-OWSGs are the weakest OWSGs from which we can get commitments (and hence much of quantum cryptography). Our construction follows along the lines of Hastad, Impagliazzo, Levin and Luby, who obtained classical pseudorandom generators (PRG) from classical one-way functions (OWF), however with crucial modifications. Our construction, when applied to the classical case, provides an alternative to the classical construction to obtain a classical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
