Foundation Models for Structural Health Monitoring

TL;DR

This paper introduces Transformer-based Foundation Models for Structural Health Monitoring, demonstrating their superior performance in anomaly detection and traffic load estimation on real-world bridge data, with efficient edge deployment.

Contribution

It pioneers the application of Transformer neural networks with Masked Auto-Encoder architecture as Foundation Models for SHM, enabling self-supervised learning and improved accuracy over traditional methods.

Findings

Achieved 99.9% anomaly detection accuracy with minimal data windows.

Outperformed PCA-based methods in anomaly detection and traffic load estimation.

Demonstrated effective model size versus accuracy trade-offs and successful knowledge distillation for edge deployment.

Abstract

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) is a critical task for ensuring the safety and reliability of civil infrastructures, typically realized on bridges and viaducts by means of vibration monitoring. In this paper, we propose for the first time the use of Transformer neural networks, with a Masked Auto-Encoder architecture, as Foundation Models for SHM. We demonstrate the ability of these models to learn generalizable representations from multiple large datasets through self-supervised pre-training, which, coupled with task-specific fine-tuning, allows them to outperform state-of-the-art traditional methods on diverse tasks, including Anomaly Detection (AD) and Traffic Load Estimation (TLE). We then extensively explore model size versus accuracy trade-offs and experiment with Knowledge Distillation (KD) to improve the performance of smaller Transformers, enabling their embedding directly into the SHM edge nodes. We showcase the effectiveness of our foundation models using data from three operational viaducts. For AD, we achieve a near-perfect 99.9% accuracy with a monitoring time span of just 15 windows. In contrast, a state-of-the-art method based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA) obtains its first good result (95.03% accuracy), only considering 120 windows. On two different TLE tasks, our models obtain state-of-the-art performance on multiple evaluation metrics (R$^2$ score, MAE% and MSE%). On the first benchmark, we achieve an R$^2$ score of 0.97 and 0.90 for light and heavy vehicle traffic, respectively, while the best previous approach (a Random Forest) stops at 0.91 and 0.84. On the second one, we achieve an R$^2$ score of 0.54 versus the 0.51 of the best competitor method, a Long-Short Term Memory network.