The $2$-torsion of determinantal hypertrees is not Cohen-Lenstra
Andr\'as M\'esz\'aros

TL;DR
This paper disproves a conjecture about the distribution of 2-torsion in the homology of determinantal hypertrees, showing it does not follow the Cohen-Lenstra distribution and establishing new properties like cosystolic expansion.
Contribution
It provides the first counterexample to the Cohen-Lenstra conjecture for 2-torsion in determinantal hypertrees and demonstrates their cosystolic expansion properties.
Findings
Disproves Cohen-Lenstra distribution for 2-torsion in $H_1(T_n,\mathbb{Z})$
Shows $T_n$ is a bad cosystolic expander with positive probability
Provides probability bounds for large 2-torsion in homology
Abstract
Let be a -dimensional determinantal hypertree on vertices. Kahle and Newman conjectured that the -torsion of asymptotically follows the Cohen-Lenstra distribution. For , we disprove this conjecture by showing that given a positive integer , for all large enough , we have \[\mathbb{P}(\dim H_1(T_n,\mathbb{F}_2)\ge h)\ge \frac{e^{-200h}}{(100h)^{5h}}.\] We also show that is a bad cosystolic expander with positive probability.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins · Commutative Algebra and Its Applications · Polynomial and algebraic computation
