Rematch: Robust and Efficient Matching of Local Knowledge Graphs to Improve Structural and Semantic Similarity
Zoher Kachwala, Jisun An, Haewoon Kwak, Filippo Menczer

TL;DR
Rematch is a new, efficient similarity metric for AMR graphs that improves semantic and structural matching, outperforming existing metrics in accuracy and speed.
Contribution
We introduce rematch, a novel AMR similarity metric, and RARE, a new structural similarity benchmark, enhancing efficiency and accuracy in graph matching.
Findings
Rematch ranks second in structural similarity among state-of-the-art metrics.
Rematch ranks first in semantic similarity, outperforming competitors by 1-5%.
Rematch is five times faster than the next most efficient metric.
Abstract
Knowledge graphs play a pivotal role in various applications, such as question-answering and fact-checking. Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) represents text as knowledge graphs. Evaluating the quality of these graphs involves matching them structurally to each other and semantically to the source text. Existing AMR metrics are inefficient and struggle to capture semantic similarity. We also lack a systematic evaluation benchmark for assessing structural similarity between AMR graphs. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a novel AMR similarity metric, rematch, alongside a new evaluation for structural similarity called RARE. Among state-of-the-art metrics, rematch ranks second in structural similarity; and first in semantic similarity by 1--5 percentage points on the STS-B and SICK-R benchmarks. Rematch is also five times faster than the next most efficient metric.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Neural Networks · Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques · Recommender Systems and Techniques
