Electrical and seismic refraction methods: fundamental concepts, current trends, and emerging machine learning prospects -- A review
Adedibu Sunny Akingboye

TL;DR
This review discusses electrical and seismic refraction methods, highlighting recent advances, challenges, and the promising role of machine learning in improving subsurface imaging and interpretation.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of traditional techniques and explores emerging machine learning applications for enhanced data analysis and inversion in geophysical surveys.
Findings
ML improves inversion accuracy
ML automates lithological differentiation
ML enhances data interpretation
Abstract
This comprehensive review examines electrical and seismic refraction methods, emphasizing their advanced applications in electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and seismic refraction tomography (SRT). These techniques are crucial for understanding surface-subsurface crustal dynamics, offering critical insights into resistivity and velocity structures for geological and geohazard assessments. The review also explores the induced polarization (IP) and self-potential (SP) methods as complementary approaches. Despite their effectiveness, ERT and SRT face challenges due to lithological heterogeneities, complex geological processes, and geophysical data uncertainties, necessitating multidisciplinary solutions such as methodological advancements and data integration strategies. Recently, machine learning (ML) techniques have been increasingly applied to joint ERT and SRT analyses, optimizing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Seismic Waves and Analysis
