Protocols for Observational Studies: Methods and Open Problems
Dylan S. Small

TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the importance of protocols in observational studies for causal inference, illustrating their value through applications and discussing methodological considerations and open problems.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of protocols for observational studies, compares them with RCT protocols, and discusses methodological considerations and open challenges.
Findings
Protocols improve transparency and rigor in observational studies.
Applications demonstrate the practical value of well-designed protocols.
Discussion highlights key methodological differences from RCTs and open research problems.
Abstract
For learning about the causal effect of a treatment, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) is considered the gold standard. However, randomizing treatment is sometimes unethical or infeasible, and instead an observational study may be conducted. While some aspects of a well designed RCT cannot be replicated in an observational study, one aspect that can is to have a protocol with prespecified hypotheses about prespecified outcomes and a prespecified analysis. We illustrate the value of protocols for observational studies in three applications -- the effect of playing high school football on later life mental functioning, the effect of police seizing a gun when arresting a domestic violence suspect on future domestic violence and the effect of mountaintop mining on health. We then discuss methodologies for observational study protocols. We discuss considerations for protocols that are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews · Delphi Technique in Research
