An Exploratory Study on Upper-Level Computing Students' Use of Large Language Models as Tools in a Semester-Long Project

TL;DR

This study explores how upper-level computing students use large language models like ChatGPT and Copilot during a semester-long project, revealing their usage patterns, perceptions, and concerns about learning impacts.

Contribution

It provides empirical insights into students' use of LLMs in a real course setting and discusses implications for curriculum adaptation.

Findings

Students use LLMs for technical and professional tasks.

Students find LLMs efficient for information and task completion.

Concerns exist about responsible use affecting learning outcomes.

Abstract

Background: Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and CoPilot are influencing software engineering practice. Software engineering educators must teach future software engineers how to use such tools well. As of yet, there have been few studies that report on the use of LLMs in the classroom. It is, therefore, important to evaluate students' perception of LLMs and possible ways of adapting the computing curriculum to these shifting paradigms. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore computing students' experiences and approaches to using LLMs during a semester-long software engineering project. Design/Method: We collected data from a senior-level software engineering course at Purdue University. This course uses a project-based learning (PBL) design. The students used LLMs such as ChatGPT and Copilot in their projects. A sample of these student teams were interviewed to understand (1) how they used LLMs in their projects; and (2) whether and how their perspectives on LLMs changed over the course of the semester. We analyzed the data to identify themes related to students' usage patterns and learning outcomes. Results/Discussion: When computing students utilize LLMs within a project, their use cases cover both technical and professional applications. In addition, these students perceive LLMs to be efficient tools in obtaining information and completion of tasks. However, there were concerns about the responsible use of LLMs without being detrimental to their own learning outcomes. Based on our findings, we recommend future research to investigate the usage of LLM's in lower-level computer engineering courses to understand whether and how LLMs can be integrated as a learning aid without hurting the learning outcomes.