A Path Towards Legal Autonomy: An interoperable and explainable approach to extracting, transforming, loading and computing legal information using large language models, expert systems and Bayesian networks
Axel Constant, Hannes Westermann, Bryan Wilson, Alex Kiefer, Ines, Hipolito, Sylvain Pronovost, Steven Swanson, Mahault Albarracin, and Maxwell, J.D. Ramstead

TL;DR
This paper proposes a novel method combining large language models, expert legal systems, and Bayesian networks to extract, transform, and compute legal information, aiming to enable AI agents to reason about law with explainability and interoperability.
Contribution
It introduces a new integrated approach for legal information processing that enhances AI legal reasoning through explainable and interoperable methods using LLMs, expert systems, and Bayesian networks.
Findings
Demonstrated a proof of concept for legal information extraction and reasoning.
Applied the method to autonomous vehicle regulation, specifically the California Vehicle Code.
Showed potential for improving AI legal autonomy and compliance.
Abstract
Legal autonomy - the lawful activity of artificial intelligence agents - can be achieved in one of two ways. It can be achieved either by imposing constraints on AI actors such as developers, deployers and users, and on AI resources such as data, or by imposing constraints on the range and scope of the impact that AI agents can have on the environment. The latter approach involves encoding extant rules concerning AI driven devices into the software of AI agents controlling those devices (e.g., encoding rules about limitations on zones of operations into the agent software of an autonomous drone device). This is a challenge since the effectivity of such an approach requires a method of extracting, loading, transforming and computing legal information that would be both explainable and legally interoperable, and that would enable AI agents to reason about the law. In this paper, we sketch…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Law · Comparative and International Law Studies
