A Sociotechnical Readiness Level Framework for the Development of Advanced Nuclear Technologies

TL;DR

This paper proposes a sociotechnical readiness level (SRL) framework for nuclear technology development, emphasizing societal engagement, equity, and environmental justice to prevent delays and failures caused by neglecting social factors.

Contribution

It introduces the SRL framework that integrates societal considerations into technology development, extending the traditional TRL scale for complex nuclear technologies.

Findings

SRL emphasizes societal engagement in tech development.

Addressing social factors can prevent delays and failures.

Framework applicable to long-term nuclear waste management.

Abstract

The Technology Readiness Level (TRL) scale was initially developed by NASA in the 1970s and is now widely used in space, nuclear, and other complex technology sectors in the US and beyond. The TRL scale is particularly useful for determining where extrapolation of untested sub-systems or features could produce technical risk, cause expensive redesigns, or act as a roadblock to technology development. In this paper, we propose the development of a sociotechnical readiness level (SRL), premised on the understanding that the successful development and eventual use of a technology requires achieving not only full technological readiness but also anticipating, prioritizing, and addressing societal concerns that may arise during the course of development of a technology. Failures to anticipate and address societal factors in the early stages of technology development have led to high-profile delays and, in some cases, ultimate failures of nuclear technology projects. The sociotechnical readiness scale, which conceptually draws on the design research and science and technology studies scholarship, centers on principles of equity and environmental justice in technology design, and emphasizes the need for social engagement during the process of technology development. Nowhere is such an approach to technology development more vital or needed than for the long-term management of spent nuclear fuel.