Navigating Fairness: Practitioners' Understanding, Challenges, and Strategies in AI/ML Development
Aastha Pant, Rashina Hoda, Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn, Burak Turhan

TL;DR
This study explores AI practitioners' perspectives on fairness in AI/ML, identifying challenges, consequences, and strategies through interviews, and offers insights to improve fairness and trust in AI systems.
Contribution
It provides an empirical framework linking practitioners' understanding of fairness with development challenges, consequences, and mitigation strategies.
Findings
Practitioners have diverse understandings of 'fair AI/ML'.
Challenges include bias, lack of data, and resource constraints.
Strategies involve bias mitigation, transparency, and ongoing monitoring.
Abstract
The rise in the use of AI/ML applications across industries has sparked more discussions about the fairness of AI/ML in recent times. While prior research on the fairness of AI/ML exists, there is a lack of empirical studies focused on understanding the perspectives and experiences of AI practitioners in developing a fair AI/ML system. Understanding AI practitioners' perspectives and experiences on the fairness of AI/ML systems are important because they are directly involved in its development and deployment and their insights can offer valuable real-world perspectives on the challenges associated with ensuring fairness in AI/ML systems. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 AI practitioners to investigate their understanding of what a 'fair AI/ML' is, the challenges they face in developing a fair AI/ML system, the consequences of developing an unfair AI/ML system, and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI
