AI for bureaucratic productivity: Measuring the potential of AI to help automate 143 million UK government transactions
Vincent J. Straub, Youmna Hashem, Jonathan Bright, Satyam Bhagwanani,, Deborah Morgan, John Francis, Saba Esnaashari, Helen Margetts

TL;DR
This paper assesses the potential of AI to automate a significant portion of UK government transactions, estimating substantial time savings and providing a model for transaction volume measurement to guide automation efforts.
Contribution
It quantifies the scale of bureaucratic transactions suitable for AI automation and introduces a model to estimate transaction volumes, aiding government planning.
Findings
84% of complex transactions are highly automatable
Automating these could save approximately 1,200 person-years annually
High service turnover suggests focusing on general procedures for automation
Abstract
There is currently considerable excitement within government about the potential of artificial intelligence to improve public service productivity through the automation of complex but repetitive bureaucratic tasks, freeing up the time of skilled staff. Here, we explore the size of this opportunity, by mapping out the scale of citizen-facing bureaucratic decision-making procedures within UK central government, and measuring their potential for AI-driven automation. We estimate that UK central government conducts approximately one billion citizen-facing transactions per year in the provision of around 400 services, of which approximately 143 million are complex repetitive transactions. We estimate that 84% of these complex transactions are highly automatable, representing a huge potential opportunity: saving even an average of just one minute per complex transaction would save the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStock Market Forecasting Methods · Insurance and Financial Risk Management · Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
Methodstravel james · Focus
