How Human-Centered Explainable AI Interface Are Designed and Evaluated: A Systematic Survey
Thu Nguyen, Alessandro Canossa, Jichen Zhu

TL;DR
This systematic survey reviews 53 publications on human-centered explainable AI interfaces, highlighting current trends and future directions to improve user interaction, interpretability, and effectiveness of XAI systems.
Contribution
It is among the first systematic surveys analyzing design and evaluation trends in human-centered explainable AI interfaces.
Findings
Identifies key trends in EI design and evaluation.
Highlights gaps and challenges in current EI research.
Suggests promising directions for future EI development.
Abstract
Despite its technological breakthroughs, eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) research has limited success in producing the {\em effective explanations} needed by users. In order to improve XAI systems' usability, practical interpretability, and efficacy for real users, the emerging area of {\em Explainable Interfaces} (EIs) focuses on the user interface and user experience design aspects of XAI. This paper presents a systematic survey of 53 publications to identify current trends in human-XAI interaction and promising directions for EI design and development. This is among the first systematic survey of EI research.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
