Uncertainty quantification for data-driven weather models
Christopher B\"ulte, Nina Horat, Julian Quinting, Sebastian Lerch

TL;DR
This paper explores methods to quantify uncertainty in data-driven weather forecasts, enhancing the reliability of AI-based models like Pangu-Weather by providing probabilistic predictions and comparing different approaches.
Contribution
It systematically compares ensemble and statistical methods for uncertainty quantification in data-driven weather models, demonstrating improved probabilistic forecasts over traditional physics-based models.
Findings
Probabilistic forecasts outperform deterministic predictions.
Ensemble methods improve uncertainty estimation.
Results show better accuracy up to 5 days lead time.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI)-based data-driven weather forecasting models have experienced rapid progress over the last years. Recent studies, with models trained on reanalysis data, achieve impressive results and demonstrate substantial improvements over state-of-the-art physics-based numerical weather prediction models across a range of variables and evaluation metrics. Beyond improved predictions, the main advantages of data-driven weather models are their substantially lower computational costs and the faster generation of forecasts, once a model has been trained. However, most efforts in data-driven weather forecasting have been limited to deterministic, point-valued predictions, making it impossible to quantify forecast uncertainties, which is crucial in research and for optimal decision making in applications. Our overarching aim is to systematically study and compare uncertainty…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
