Reading Users' Minds from What They Say: An Investigation into LLM-based Empathic Mental Inference
Qihao Zhu, Leah Chong, Maria Yang, Jianxi Luo

TL;DR
This paper explores how Large Language Models can infer users' goals and psychological needs to improve empathic understanding in human-centered design, achieving performance comparable to human designers.
Contribution
It introduces a benchmark dataset and an empathic accuracy metric for evaluating LLMs' mental inference capabilities in user experience research.
Findings
LLMs can infer user goals and needs with accuracy similar to humans.
Zero-shot prompt engineering enhances LLMs' empathic inference performance.
Potential for scalable, in-depth user understanding in design processes.
Abstract
In human-centered design, developing a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of user experiences, i.e., empathic understanding, is paramount for designing products that truly meet human needs. Nevertheless, accurately comprehending the real underlying mental states of a large human population remains a significant challenge today. This difficulty mainly arises from the trade-off between depth and scale of user experience research: gaining in-depth insights from a small group of users does not easily scale to a larger population, and vice versa. This paper investigates the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for performing mental inference tasks, specifically inferring users' underlying goals and fundamental psychological needs (FPNs). Baseline and benchmark datasets were collected from human users and designers to develop an empathic accuracy metric for measuring the mental inference…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Law · Topic Modeling
