A psychophysical evaluation of techniques for Mooney image generation
Lars C. Reining, Thomas S. A. Wallis

TL;DR
This study systematically evaluates how different thresholding techniques and levels of smoothing affect the interpretability of automatically generated Mooney images, revealing that threshold choice is less critical than smoothing parameters.
Contribution
It introduces an automated approach to Mooney image generation and assesses the perceptual effects of various image processing techniques on human interpretability.
Findings
Thresholding technique choice has minimal impact on interpretability.
Smoothing level significantly influences Mooney image clarity.
Automatic generation can replace manual, subjective methods.
Abstract
Mooney images can contribute to our understanding of the processes involved in visual perception, because they allow a dissociation between image content and image understanding. Mooney images are generated by first smoothing and subsequently thresholding an image. In most previous studies this was performed manually, using subjective criteria for generation. This manual process could eventually be avoided by using automatic generation techniques. The field of computer image processing offers numerous techniques for image thresholding, but these are only rarely used to create Mooney images. Furthermore, there is little research on the perceptual effects of smoothing and thresholding. Therefore, in this study we investigated how the choice of different thresholding techniques and amount of smoothing affects the interpretability of Mooney images for human participants. We generated Mooney…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts
