Evaluation Ethics of LLMs in Legal Domain
Ruizhe Zhang, Haitao Li, Yueyue Wu, Qingyao Ai, Yiqun Liu, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma

TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the importance of evaluating legal ethics and domain-specific proficiency of large language models (LLMs) in the legal field, proposing a novel methodology using authentic legal cases for assessment.
Contribution
It introduces a new evaluation approach for LLMs in legal contexts, focusing on ethical and domain-specific capabilities using real legal cases.
Findings
Assessed LLMs' legal knowledge and robustness
Identified gaps in legal ethics integration
Provided insights into LLM suitability for legal tasks
Abstract
In recent years, the utilization of large language models for natural language dialogue has gained momentum, leading to their widespread adoption across various domains. However, their universal competence in addressing challenges specific to specialized fields such as law remains a subject of scrutiny. The incorporation of legal ethics into the model has been overlooked by researchers. We asserts that rigorous ethic evaluation is essential to ensure the effective integration of large language models in legal domains, emphasizing the need to assess domain-specific proficiency and domain-specific ethic. To address this, we propose a novelty evaluation methodology, utilizing authentic legal cases to evaluate the fundamental language abilities, specialized legal knowledge and legal robustness of large language models (LLMs). The findings from our comprehensive evaluation contribute…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLaw, AI, and Intellectual Property · Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
