Comment on "All-Loop Result for the Strong Magnetic Field Limit of the Heisenberg-Euler Effective Lagrangian"
Stefan Evans, Johann Rafelski

TL;DR
This paper critically examines a recent claim about the Euler-Heisenberg effective Lagrangian, revealing discrepancies with established series at the two-loop level, thus questioning the previous results' accuracy.
Contribution
It provides a second analysis of the all-loop results for the strong magnetic field limit, highlighting differences from prior claims at the two-loop order.
Findings
Discrepancies with the claimed all-loop results at two-loop level
Differences observed compared to the Schwinger-Dyson series
Questions raised about the accuracy of recent improvements
Abstract
We offer a 2nd look at the recently claimed improvement of Euler-Heisenberg-Schwinger (EHS) action [PRL \textbf{122} (2019) no.21, 211602 and post-publication correction]: We demonstrate a difference to the claimed concordance with the Schwinger-Dyson series starting at the two-loop level.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory · Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
