Generalizing Fairness to Generative Language Models via Reformulation of Non-discrimination Criteria
Sara Sterlie, Nina Weng, Aasa Feragen

TL;DR
This paper develops methods to identify and measure gender bias in large language models by adapting fairness criteria from classification, focusing on occupational stereotypes in medical contexts.
Contribution
It introduces generative AI analogues of non-discrimination fairness criteria and applies them to detect occupational gender bias in language models.
Findings
Identified gender bias in medical occupational stereotypes.
Demonstrated applicability of fairness criteria to generative models.
Provided prompts to measure bias in conversational AI.
Abstract
Generative AI, such as large language models, has undergone rapid development within recent years. As these models become increasingly available to the public, concerns arise about perpetuating and amplifying harmful biases in applications. Gender stereotypes can be harmful and limiting for the individuals they target, whether they consist of misrepresentation or discrimination. Recognizing gender bias as a pervasive societal construct, this paper studies how to uncover and quantify the presence of gender biases in generative language models. In particular, we derive generative AI analogues of three well-known non-discrimination criteria from classification, namely independence, separation and sufficiency. To demonstrate these criteria in action, we design prompts for each of the criteria with a focus on occupational gender stereotype, specifically utilizing the medical test to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques
MethodsFocus
