Unknown Domain Inconsistency Minimization for Domain Generalization
Seungjae Shin, HeeSun Bae, Byeonghu Na, Yoon-Yeong Kim, Il-Chul, Moon

TL;DR
This paper proposes Unknown Domain Inconsistency Minimization (UDIM), a novel approach that improves domain generalization by aligning loss landscapes between source and perturbed domains, outperforming existing methods.
Contribution
UDIM introduces a combined parameter and data perturbation objective that reduces loss landscape inconsistency, enhancing generalization to unseen domains in domain generalization tasks.
Findings
UDIM outperforms SAM variants on multiple benchmarks.
UDIM shows significant improvements in restrictive domain scenarios.
Theoretically, UDIM establishes an upper bound for the DG objective.
Abstract
The objective of domain generalization (DG) is to enhance the transferability of the model learned from a source domain to unobserved domains. To prevent overfitting to a specific domain, Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) reduces source domain's loss sharpness. Although SAM variants have delivered significant improvements in DG, we highlight that there's still potential for improvement in generalizing to unknown domains through the exploration on data space. This paper introduces an objective rooted in both parameter and data perturbed regions for domain generalization, coined Unknown Domain Inconsistency Minimization (UDIM). UDIM reduces the loss landscape inconsistency between source domain and unknown domains. As unknown domains are inaccessible, these domains are empirically crafted by perturbing instances from the source domain dataset. In particular, by aligning the loss…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2024 poster
1.This work extends the parameter perturbation in existing SAM optimization to data perturbation, achieving loss landscape alignment between source domains and unknown domains. Experiments show the validity of the proposed objective. 2.This work establishes an upper bound for DG by merging SAM optimization with the proposed objective. 3.The proposed objective can be combined with multiple SAM optimizers and further enhance their performance, demonstrating the necessity of the loss landscape
1.I believe that the proposed data perturbation method is consistent in both ideology and essence with traditional domain augmentation and adversarial attack techniques. So, what is the main difference and advantage of the proposed objective? And what if combining some domain augmentation techniques with the SAM optimizers? 2.How to guarantee that the perturbed data is still meaningful, rather than generating some noisy samples? If so, will enforced the loss landscape alignment across domains b
1. This paper considered a reasonable solution in domain generalization. Both parameter and data perturbations are conducted for a robust OOD generalization. 2. The idea seems novel for me in some settings. 3. Extensive empirical results. Based on these points, I would recommend a borderline positive.
1. Sometimes I find it a bit hard to understand the rationale of the proposed approach. Why do we need to consider both parameter and data perturbation? For example, in paper [1], a theoretical analysis is proposed, which is analogous to equation (11) as the parameter robust. 2. Does the choice of data perturbation matter? We know we may face many different possible data-augmentation approaches. Which method(s) do you think should work in this scenario? 3. Is it possible to consider the subgrou
1. The paper appears to be technically sound. It provides a well-defined problem statement for domain generalization and formulates UDIM as an optimization objective. The authors validate the theoretical foundation of UDIM and provide empirical results across various benchmark datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness. The methodology is explained clearly, and the experiments are well-documented. 2. The paper is well-structured and clearly written. It provides a thorough introduction, problem d
1. Baselines. The baselines are not enough because the latest DG method is Fisher, which is published at 2022.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsImage Processing Techniques and Applications · Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
MethodsSegment Anything Model · Sharpness-Aware Minimization
