A Survey of Explainable Knowledge Tracing
Yanhong Bai, Jiabao Zhao, Tingjiang Wei, Qing Cai, Liang He

TL;DR
This paper reviews the current state of explainable knowledge tracing, analyzing models, interpretability methods, and evaluation approaches to enhance transparency and trust in AI-driven educational systems.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive classification of explainable knowledge tracing models and discusses the challenges in evaluation methods, offering insights for future research.
Findings
Current evaluation methods for explainable knowledge tracing are inadequate.
Contrast and deletion experiments can elucidate model predictions.
Educational stakeholders' perspectives are crucial for assessment.
Abstract
With the long term accumulation of high quality educational data, artificial intelligence has shown excellent performance in knowledge tracing. However, due to the lack of interpretability and transparency of some algorithms, this approach will result in reduced stakeholder trust and a decreased acceptance of intelligent decisions. Therefore, algorithms need to achieve high accuracy, and users need to understand the internal operating mechanism and provide reliable explanations for decisions. This paper thoroughly analyzes the interpretability of KT algorithms. First, the concepts and common methods of explainable artificial intelligence and knowledge tracing are introduced. Next, explainable knowledge tracing models are classified into two categories: transparent models and black box models. Then, the interpretable methods used are reviewed from three stages: ante hoc interpretable…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Access Control and Trust
MethodsHigh-Order Consensuses
