Rubidium and cesium ion-induced electron and ion signals for scanning ion microscopy applications
Y. Li, S. Xu, T. H. Loeber, E. J. D. Vredenbregt

TL;DR
This study compares rubidium and cesium ion sources to gallium in scanning ion microscopy, showing Rb$^+$ and Cs$^+$ produce higher secondary electron yields and different ion signal characteristics, promising improved imaging performance.
Contribution
It introduces ultracold Rb$^+$ and Cs$^+$ ion sources for scanning ion microscopy and compares their performance with traditional Ga$^+$ systems.
Findings
Rb$^+$ and Cs$^+$ yield higher secondary electrons than Ga$^+$.
Cs$^+$ ion signals are dominated by secondary ions.
Rb$^+$ and Cs$^+$ produce different ion signal profiles.
Abstract
Scanning ion microscopy applications of novel focused ion beam (FIB) systems based on ultracold rubidium (Rb) and cesium (Cs) atoms were investigated via ion-induced electron and ion yields. Results measured on the Rb and Cs FIB systems were compared with results from commercially available gallium (Ga) systems to verify the merits of applying Rb and Cs for imaging. The comparison shows that Rb and Cs have higher secondary electron (SE) yields on a variety of pure element targets than Ga, which implies a higher signal-to-noise ratio can be achieved for the same dose in SE imaging using Rb/Cs than Ga. In addition, analysis of the ion-induced ion signals reveals that secondary ions dominate Cs induced ion signals while the Rb/Ga induced signals contain more backscattered ions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIon-surface interactions and analysis · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
